|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 4 1048-1060, Copyright © 1979 by APS
ARTICLES |
S. E. Laskin and W. A. Spencer
1. Psychophysical masking of cutaneous sensation at the locus of punctate test stimulation has been quantitatively examined with phasic mechanical and brief air-pulse stimuli using a conditioning-test stimulus paradigm. 2. Masking was maximal at the minimal interstimulus distance effective with this paradigm, varies inversely with interstimulus distance, and is demonstrable with the conditioning and test stimuli up to 10 cm apart on the forearm. 3. The degree of masking was found to be a direct function of the relative intensity of the conditioning stimulus with respect to the test stimulus. 4. Variations in the interstimulus interval permitted an investigation of the temporal features of cutaneous masking. It was detectable from 10 ms before to 70 ms after conditioning stimulation. Maximum masking occurred when the test stimulus was delivered about 10 ms following conditioning stimulus onset. 5. We also noted the much less marked, but still significant, enhancement phenomenon, in which weak conditioning stimuli, at just-threshold intensity levels, lowered the detection threshold for sensation at the test stimulus locus. We found this enhancement of sensation to have the same spatial distribution as did masking, but a much reduced time course. It began with the test stimulus presented simultaneously with the conditioning stimulus, peaked with 10--15 ms interstimulus intervals, but decayed in less than 40 ms. 6. Since psychophysical experiments often form the framework for the understanding of physiologic processes, it is suggested that these behavioral determinations of enhancement and masking may be correlated with the electrophysiologic properties of excitation and inhibition in neurons of the major primary somatic pathways of the central nervous system.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras Frequency Adaptation Modulates Spatial Integration of Sensory Responses in the Rat Whisker System J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3819 - 3824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Higley and D. Contreras Cellular Mechanisms of Suppressive Interactions Between Somatosensory Responses In Vivo J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 647 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Chapman and E. Beauchamp Differential Controls Over Tactile Detection in Humans by Motor Commands and Peripheral Reafference J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1664 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Williams and C. E. Chapman Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. III. Effect of Motor Tasks J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1968 - 1979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Mongeluzi, T. A. Hoppe, and W. N. Frost Prepulse Inhibition of the Tritonia Escape Swim J. Neurosci., October 15, 1998; 18(20): 8467 - 8472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Williams, J. Shenasa, and C. E. Chapman Time Course and Magnitude of Movement-Related Gating of Tactile Detection in Humans. I. Importance of Stimulus Location J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1998; 79(2): 947 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |