JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 42: 123-136, 1979;
0022-3077/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D. R.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 1 123-136, Copyright © 1979 by APS


ARTICLES

Acoustic input to single neurons in pulvinar-posterior complex of cat thalamus

D. P. Phillips and D. R. Irvine

1. Extracellular microelectrode recordings have been made of 429 single neurons in the pulvinar-posterior (Pul-PO) complex and adjacent regions of the thalamus of cats anesthetized with either sodium pentobarbital or alpha-chloralose. Controlled acoustic stimuli were presented by sealed systems incorporating probe microphone assemblies. 2. Neurons in pulvinar, lateralis posterior, and nucleus posterior were unresponsive to acoustic stimulation. Few cells in medial PO were observed to receive acoustic input, while sensitivity to tonal stimuli was a general feature of driven cells in other PO divisions. 3. Cells in lateral PO were generally sharply tuned to stimulus frequency, while the majority of cells in magnocellular medial geniculate and intermediate division of PO were broadly tuned. 4. Neurons in lateral PO and magnocellular medial geniculate had short response latencies to acoustic stimulation. Cells in intermediate division of PO were more often long latency. 5. Divisions of PO could not be differentiated on the basis of their binaural properties. Cells receiving excitatory input from solely the contralateral ear (E/O) or fros with onset discharge patterns showed occlusive binaural interaction properties. For cells with multiple-component discharge patterns, individual response components frequently had different patterns of binaural input and/or interaction. 6. On the basis of their discharge patterns, short latency, and frequency-tuning properties, it is suggested that lateral PO and magnocellular medial geniculate might derive their acoustic input from different divisions of the inferior colliculus. In contrast, the long latencies of units in PO intermediate division suggests a corticofugal input. 7. These data support anatomical parcelations of the Pul-PO complex, and the suggestion that this complex might provide acoustic input to the association cortices is evaluated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. Loftus and M. L. Sutter
Spectrotemporal Organization of Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Cat Posterior Auditory Field Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 475 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online