JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 40: 1113-1120, 1977;
0022-3077/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottoson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottoson, D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 40, Issue 5 1113-1120, Copyright © 1977 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of primary and secondary endings of isolated mammalian muscle spindles to sinusoidal length changes

C. C. Hunt and D. Ottoson

1. Responses of primary and secondary endings of isolated cat spindles to sinusoidal length changes have been recorded before and after block of impulse activity by tetrodotoxin. 2. Primary endings may discharge with each cycle of sinusoidal stretch at 25-50 Hz, with stretch amplitudes applied to the spindle poles as small as 1 micron. Thresholds are higher at lower frequencies. 3. In primary endings, amplitude of the receptor potential varies with frequency and magnitude of sinusoidal stretch. At a given stretch amplitude, the receptor-potential response increases markedly between 1 and 10 Hz. At a fixed frequency, for example, at Hz, the response to graded amplitude of sinusoidal stretch is highly nonlinear, sensitivity decreasing with large amplitudes. 4. Secondary endings show a much higher threshold than primary endings to sinusoidal stretch. Thus, at 25 Hz, secondary endings required stretch amplitudes of 50-100 micron to evoke discharge. Relatively large amplitudes of stretch were also required to evoked detectable receptor potentials. Over the range studied, the receptor potential varied more linearly with stretch amplitude in secondary than in primary endings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. LEDUC, E. BRUNKO, and A. DE TROYER
Response of the Canine Internal Intercostal Muscles to Chest Wall Vibration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2001; 163(1): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. LEDUC, E. BRUNKO, and A. DE TROYER
Response of the Canine Inspiratory Intercostal Muscles to Chest Wall Vibration
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2000; 161(2): 510 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online