JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 40: 260-283, 1977;
0022-3077/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, P. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, P. O.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 40, Issue 2 260-283, Copyright © 1977 by APS


ARTICLES

Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex

J. I. Nelson, H. Kato and P. O. Bishop

1. We have examined and compared the ability of binocularly activated striate neurons to make both position disparity and orientation disparity discrimination in the anesthetized (N2O/O2) and paralyzed cat preparation. 2. Accurate knowledge of eye position is essential for disparity studies. Using a retinal projection technique able to detect eye drifts of less than 3' arc per retinal landmark and less than 18' arc cyclorotation disparity, we determined eye drift during the course of 2- to 4-day experiments. After the initial eye rotation due to the anesthesia and the onset of paralysis (see below), rotational drift thereafter was mainly excyclorotatory and, from all causes, rarely totaled more than 4 degrees disparity. All our data have been corrected for this residual cyclorotatory drift. 3. Optimal stimulus orientation disparities were determined from quantitative monocular orientation tuning curves for 74 binocularly activated striate cells (37 simple, 3 hypercomplex I, 31 complex, 3 hypercomplex II) from nine cats. Without exception, the mean optimal stimulus orientation disparity in each of our animals showed a departure from zero disparity equivalent to an incyclorotation of the eyes (mean, 9.2 degrees; range, 2.7 degrees-15.9 degrees). 4. We attribute this mean optimal stimulus orientation disparity shift to ocular cyclorotation as a result of the initial anesthesia and paralysis. Assuming equal intortion, incyclorotation for each eye averages 4.6 degrees. On the assumption that the mean optimal stimulus orientation disparity is zero in normal life, we pooled results from the nine animals about their individual means. For the 74 cells the resulting distribution of the optimal stimulus orientation disparities had a range of about +/-15 degrees (simple cells: SD 4.9 degrees; complex cells: SD 7.4 degrees). 5. We examined the relationship of the sharpness of the orientation tuning curves to ocular dominance, to absolute orientation preference, and to other unit properties. The striking observation was the high correlation between the sharpness of orientation tuning curves for the two eyes of a binocular neuron. For simple cells the mean difference for the half-widths of half-height was only 2.54 degrees, with sharpness showing a high correlation between the two eyes (r=0.915) over half-width at half-heights ranging from 8.5 degrees to 41.8 degrees. Complex cells showed a similar, albeit weaker, correlation. 6. Having shown that, assessed monocularly binocular units show different orientation tunings in the two eyes, we undertook binocular experiments to ascertain if these differences were the optimal disparities of sharply tuned stimulus orientation disparity channels. Using a matrix stimulation paradigm to minimize the effects of spontaneous changes in responsiveness, we have simultaneously extracted bionocular stimulus orientation disparity and position disparity tuning curves from single striate neurons...


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. M. Sanada and I. Ohzawa
Encoding of Three-Dimensional Surface Slant in Cat Visual Areas 17 and 18
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2006; 95(5): 2768 - 2786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Li, M. R. Peterson, and R. D. Freeman
Oblique Effect: A Neural Basis in the Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 204 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Bridge and B. G. Cumming
Responses of Macaque V1 Neurons to Binocular Orientation Differences
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7293 - 7302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 874 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. L. Smith III, Y. M. Chino, J. Ni, W. H. Ridder III, and M.L.J. Crawford
Binocular Spatial Phase Tuning Characteristics of Neurons in the Macaque Striate Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1997; 78(1): 351 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online