JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 40: 44-52, 1977;
0022-3077/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neff, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Casseday, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neff, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Casseday, J. H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 40, Issue 1 44-52, Copyright © 1977 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects of unilateral ablation of auditory cortex on monaural cat's ability to localize sound

W. D. Neff and J. H. Casseday

1. Cats with one cochlea destroyed were trained to localize sound. After behavioral measures of the animal's accuracy of localization were made, cortical auditory areas were ablated unilaterally. 2. The results showed: a) like binaural localization, monaural localization of sound in space, as measured by the ability of an animal to move toward a sound source, depends on integrity of auditory cortex; b) it is only ablation of cortex contralateral to the functional ear that seriously affects localizing behavior; ablation of cortex ipsilateral to the intact cochlea has little or no effect on localizing behavior. 3. To explain the results, we suggest that auditory cortex is essential for an organized perception of space including the relation of the animal's position to other objects in space. We also suggest that auditory cortex contralateral to a given ear is necessary in order for the animal to recognize that a stimulus is presented to that ear of, when both ears are intact, to recognize that the stimulus to the given ear differs in some way (intensity, time of arrival, sequential arrangement of sounds) from the stimulus to the opposite ear.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. J. Malone, B. H. Scott, and M. N. Semple
Context-Dependent Adaptive Coding of Interaural Phase Disparity in the Auditory Cortex of Awake Macaques
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 4625 - 4638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Imig, P. Poirier, W. A. Irons, and F. K. Samson
Monaural Spectral Contrast Mechanism for Neural Sensitivity to Sound Direction in the Medial Geniculate Body of the Cat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2754 - 2771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online