JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 40: 119-135, 1977;
0022-3077/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emerson, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gerstein, G. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 40, Issue 1 119-135, Copyright © 1977 by APS


ARTICLES

Simple striate neurons in the cat. I. Comparison of responses to moving and stationary stimuli

R. C. Emerson and G. L. Gerstein

1. Peristimulus time (PST) histograms of simple striate responses to static presentations of narrow bright and dark bars in an array of receptive-field (RF) positions have demonstrated one to four response regions with distinct response properties. 2. There is a high degree of correlation of these responses with PST histograms of responses to the same stimuli moving smoothly ("dynamic" stimuli) in a direction perpendicular to the long axis of the RF. 3. Trailing responses to smoothly moving bar stimuli usually occur as the stimulus leaves an apparently inhibitory (for that stimulus) RF region. 4. Spatially leading responses to smoothly moving stimuli occur just as a bar stimulus enters an excitatory RF region, and may be based on certain gradient-detecting properties of neurons. 5. Close agreement in peak firing rates and in positions of responses for statically and dynamically elicited responses in units that are not strongly directionally selective suggests the possibility that in most respects smooth movement responses may be the sequential linear superposition of static responses. A quantitative superposition of static responses from two units supports this conclusion. 6. The dependence on a steady background for sustained responses to static presentation of dark bars illustrates the significance of steady illumination in the RF and raises questions about the efficacy of using edge stimuli as elemental visual probes.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online