JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 39: 1257-1271, 1976;
0022-3077/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nudelman, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glantz, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nudelman, H. B.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 6 1257-1271, Copyright © 1976 by APS


ARTICLES

Sustained, synchronous oscillations in discharge of sustaining fibers of crayfish optic nerve

R. M. Glantz and H. B. Nudelman

1. The regularity of the sustaining fiber (SF) steady-state discharge increases with the intensity of a uniform field of illumination. 2. In a high levels of illumination SFs exhibit a highly periodic or rhythmically bursting steady-state discharge. 3. The period of the burst cycle is independent of the light intensity and the mean firing rate. 4. Multimodal interspike-interval histograms in which successive modes decline exponentially suggest that the discharge arises from a regular input. 5. In conditions of uniform illumination, the regular input must be common to all or several SFs since the period of the burst cycle of simultaneously monitored SFs are the same and cross-correlations indicate that the SFs burst in approximate synchrony. 6. It is proposed that the common, regular input is a network of presynaptic elements exhibiting recurrent lateral inhibition. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is that following a brief light pulse to the inhibitory surround, SFs exhibit cycles of silence and bursting, phase-locked to the stimulus but with a period equal to the steady-state burst-cycle period. 7. Furthermore, lateral inhibitory influences are common to several or all SFs as indicated by the close similarity in response time course of two SFs subjected to a common inhibitory stimulus. 8. The response of the lateral pathways to sinusoidally modulated illumination is highly selective to frequencies near the burst-repetition rate. The excitatory pathways exhibit frequency modulation or entrainment over a wide range of input frequencies. 9. The intersustaining burst cycle phase is under partial visual stimulus control (position and intensity) and the possibility of phase coding in the SF ensemble is discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. M. Glantz and J. P. Schroeter
Analysis and Simulation of Gain Control and Precision in Crayfish Visual Interneurons
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2747 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online