Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 5 1269-1283, Copyright © 1975 by APS

ARTICLES

An olfactory projection area in orbitofrontal cortex of the monkey

T. Tanabe, H. Yarita, M. Iino, Y. Ooshima and S. F. Takagi

An olfactory projection area was studied in monkeys anesthetized with Nembutal. 1. Evoked potentials were recorded when the olfactory bulb (OB) was electrically stimulated in the lateroposterior portion of the orbitofrontal cortex (LPOF). However, those potentials disappeared when the anterior pyriform cortex (AP) (probably together with the medial portion of the amygdala (MA)) was aspirated or electrically destroyed. 2. In nearly the entire hypothalamic region, evoked potentials were recorded by the same stimulation of the OB. When the hypothalamic region was stimulated, evoked potentials were recorded in the LPOF. 3. The evoked potentials in the LPOF due to the OB stimulation never disappeared even when the thalamus was extensively aspirated or destroyed electrically, but they did disappear when the anterolateral and dorsoposterior portions of the hypothalamus were absorbed or electrocoagulated. 4. Evoked potentials in the mediodorsal nucleus (MD) of the thalamus were recorded when the OB was stimulated. When this nucleus was stimulated, evoked potentials were observed in the broad extent of the orbitofrontal cortex anterior to the LPOF, but never in the LPOF itself. 5. Monkeys were conditioned to discriminate two odors. When the LPOF was removed, such ability strikingly decreased; but when other areas in the prefrontal cortex were removed, the ability decreased only slightly. 6. It was concluded that there exists an olfactory pathway from the OB to the LPOF through the AP (and probably the MA) and the hypothalamus, but none through the thalamus, and that the LPOF plays an important role in the discrimination of odors. 7. It was proved that the entorhinal cortex (ER) is neither located as an intermediate olfactory area nor is it situated as a higher area than the LPOF in the newly found olfactory pathway stated above. It may be a link between the high olfactory area and the limbic system.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Boyle, J. Djordjevic, M. J. Olsson, J. N. Lundstrom, and M. Jones-Gotman The Human Brain Distinguishes between Single Odorants and Binary Mixtures Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Plailly, J. D. Howard, D. R. Gitelman, and J. A. Gottfried Attention to Odor Modulates Thalamocortical Connectivity in the Human Brain J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5257 - 5267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Boyle, M. Heinke, J. Gerber, J. Frasnelli, and T. Hummel Cerebral Activation to Intranasal Chemosensory Trigeminal Stimulation Chem Senses, May 1, 2007; 32(4): 343 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sasabe, M. Kobayashi, Y. Kondo, H. Onoe, S. Matsubara, S. Yamamoto, H. Tsukada, K. Onoe, H. Watabe, H. Iida, et al. Activation of the Anterior Cingulate Gyrus by 'Green Odor': A Positron Emission Tomography Study in the Monkey Chem Senses, September 1, 2003; 28(7): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Dade, R. J. Zatorre, and M. Jones-Gotman Olfactory learning: convergent findings from lesion and brain imaging studies in humans Brain, January 1, 2002; 125(1): 86 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Suzuki, H. D. Critchley, J. Suckling, R. Fukuda, S. C.R. Williams, C. Andrew, R. Howard, E. Ouldred, C. Bryant, C. G. Swift, et al. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Odor Identification: The Effect of Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2001; 56(12): M756 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Small, R. J. Zatorre, A. Dagher, A. C. Evans, and M. Jones-Gotman Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate: From pleasure to aversion Brain, September 1, 2001; 124(9): 1720 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]