Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 4 812-821, Copyright © 1975 by APS

ARTICLES

Latency of unit responses in cochlear nucleus determined in two different ways

A. R. Moller

The latency revealed by poststimulus time histograms of the responses of single units in the cochlear nucleus to tone bursts was compared with the latency of the change in discharge frequency in response to small increments in the amplitude of the stimulus. The latter was derived on the basis of statistical signal analysis of the discharge pattern in response to tones amplitude modulated with pseudorandom noise. The "step response" of the system was computed by time integration of the cross covariance between modulation and spike density. The following observations can be made: 1. The latency of the responses to tone bursts always decreased with increasing sound intensity, whereas the latency of the step response was almost constant for intensities from immediately above threshold to the highest intensity used (60-70 dB above threshold). 2. In most units the latency revealed by the PST histogram of the responses to tone bursts approached the value of latency of the step response asymptotically. 3. In some units with longer latency, the latency of the response to tone bursts was many times greater than the latency of the step response, even at high sound intensities. 4. A histogram of latency values of the step response of the units studied showed narrow peaks at 2.8 and 4.7 ms. 5. On the basis of the present results it is concluded that the latency values of the step response represent the true sum of synaptic and axon dendritical propagation delay, whereas the latency of the responses to tone bursts also includes the temporal summation at the synaptic level.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Chase and E. D. Young First-spike latency information in single neurons increases when referenced to population onset PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5175 - 5180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Gai and L. H. Carney Temporal Measures and Neural Strategies for Detection of Tones in Noise Based on Responses in Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2451 - 2464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zhang and J. B. Kelly Responses of Neurons in the Rat's Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus to Monaural and Binaural Tone Bursts J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2501 - 2512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Galazyuk, W. Lin, D. Llano, and A. S. Feng Leading Inhibition to Neural Oscillation Is Important for Time-Domain Processing in the Auditory Midbrain J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 314 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. van der Heijden and P. X. Joris The Speed of Auditory Low-Side Suppression J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 201 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. X. JORIS, C. E. SCHREINER, and A. REES Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 541 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Vollmer, R. L. Snyder, P. A. Leake, R. E. Beitel, C. M. Moore, and S. J. Rebscher Temporal Properties of Chronic Cochlear Electrical Stimulation Determine Temporal Resolution of Neurons in Cat Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 2883 - 2902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. W. Wilson and W. E. O'Neill Auditory Motion Induces Directionally Dependent Receptive Field Shifts in Inferior Colliculus Neurons J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 2040 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]