JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 38: 663-672, 1975;
0022-3077/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Houk, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Houk, J. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 3 663-672, Copyright © 1975 by APS


ARTICLES

Analysis of response properties of deefferented mammalian spindle receptors based on frequency response

Z. Hasan and J. C. Houk

Sinusoidal responses of primary and secondary endings in deefferented spindles of anesthetized cats were studied over the low-frequency range 0.001-0.1 Hz. Stretch amplitudes were chosen conservatively small (25-100 mum peak-to-peak) so as to lie within the linear region. 1. At 0.1 Hz average sensitivity was 350 pps/mm for primary endings and 80 pps/mm for secondary endings. Sensitivity fell to lower values at lower frequencies, but even at 0.001 Hz, corresponding to 17 min/cycle, sensitivity remained elevated above static values determined with large stretches. Phase lead varied from 5 to 50 degrees and, in the case of primary endings, tended to be greater at lower frequencies. 2. Except for the different scaling factors, the only apparent difference between the frequency responses of primary and secondary endings was a tendency for primary endings to show a greater phase lead over the range 0.001-0.01 Hz. 3. Dynamic responsiveness was assessed theoretically from frequency-response data by calculating responses to ramps at various velocities. Over most of the velocity range dynamic responses were not proportional to velocity. The greater dynamic responsiveness of primary endings during large (6 mm) ramp stretches might be related to frequency response below 0.01 Hz. 4. Certain aspects of dynamic responsiveness to large ramps (6 mm) were accounted for by assuming all phases of responses were attenuated by 25 dB in the case of primary endings and 20 dB in the case of secondary endings. The nonlinearity responsible for attenuation appears to occur at an early stage in the sensory process. 5. Comparison of individual responses to slow ramps with predictions based on linear theory indicated the presence of abrupt departures from linearity for both primary and secondary endings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Wang and R. L. Sainburg
Interlimb Transfer of Novel Inertial Dynamics Is Asymmetrical
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 349 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. L. Sainburg, C. Ghez, and D. Kalakanis
Intersegmental Dynamics Are Controlled by Sequential Anticipatory, Error Correction, and Postural Mechanisms
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 1045 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online