JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 38: 267-284, 1975;
0022-3077/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudomin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dutton, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudomin, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dutton, H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 2 267-284, Copyright © 1975 by APS


ARTICLES

Control by Preynaptic Correlation: a mechanism affecting information transmission from Ia fibers to motoneurons

P. Rudomin, R. E. Burke, R. Nunez, J. Madrid and H. Dutton

1. In the unanesthetized spinal cord of the cat, simultaneous intracellular recordings were made from two motoneurons belonging to the gastronemius motor nucleus. 2. Supramaximal iterative stimulation of small branches of the gastrocnemius nerve produced monosynaptic EPSPs (Ia EPSPs) of varying amplitude superimposed on a fluctuating base line. 3. In most cases the variance of the motoneuron membrane potential was increased above base-line levels with a time course approximately matching the Ia EPSP. This suggests that Ia EPSP fluctuations are greater than can be accounted for by the base-line fluctuations alone. 4. For a given series of Ia EPSPs, the smaller responses in the series had about the same decay phase as the larger EPSPs, suggesting that most of the Ia EPSP fluctuations were not due to systematic changes in postsynaptic conductances produced by ongoing activity, but rather to a presynaptic mechanism. 5. Simultaneous recording from two motoneurons showed that base-line fluctuations were positively correlated. In most cases, however, there was an additional increased correlation above base-line levels resembling the time course of the Ia EPSPs, indicating positive correlation between EPSP fluctuations which is attributed to a presynaptic mechanism. 6. Conditioning volleys to group I muscle afferents or to low-threshold cutaneous afferents reduced the variance of the Ia EPSPs and also their correlation in motoneuron pairs, often without changing the mean Ia EPSPs. 7. It is concluded that, in the unanesthetized spinal cord, in addition to the random process which governs transmitter release intrinsic to a given synaptic terminal, there is another stochastic process affecting, in a correlated manner, transmitter release in large sets of Ia synaptic terminals. Most likely, the correlation in transmitter release is achieved by membrane potential fluctuations imposed on the Ia terminal arborizations by ongoing activity of the segmental mechanism mediating primary afferent depolarization. 8. The effects of such a correlating influence on cell firing behavior have been analyzed. The results suggest that this mechanism, referred to as control by presynaptic correlation, is able to modulate the information transmitted from Ia fibers to motoneurons.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. G. Maltenfort and R. E. Burke
Spindle Model Responsive to Mixed Fusimotor Inputs and Testable Predictions of beta Feedback Effects
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2797 - 2809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M Solodkin, I Jimenez, and P Rudomin
Identification of common interneurons mediating pre- and postsynaptic inhibition in the cat spinal cord
Science, June 29, 1984; 224(4656): 1453 - 1456.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online