JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol (November 4, 2009). doi:10.1152/jn.00501.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vasudevan, E. V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bastian, A. J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vasudevan, E. V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bastian, A. J
Submitted on June 9, 2009
Revised on October 13, 2009
Accepted on October 27, 2009

Split-belt treadmill adaptation shows different functional networks for fast and slow human walking

Erin Virginia Lamont Vasudevan1 and Amy J Bastian2*

1 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
2 Kennedy Krieger Inst

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bastian-jnp{at}kennedykrieger.org.

New walking patterns can be learned over short timescales (i.e. adapted in minutes) using a split-belt treadmill that controls the speed of each leg independently. This leads to storage of a modified motor pattern that is expressed as an aftereffect in regular walking conditions and must be de-adapted to return to normal. Here we asked whether the nervous system adapts a general walking pattern that is used across many speeds or a specific pattern affecting only the two speeds experienced during split-belt training. In experiment 1, we tested three groups of healthy adult subjects walking at different split-belt speed combinations and then assessed aftereffects at a range of speeds. We found that aftereffects were largest at the slower speed that was used in split-belt training in all three groups, and it decayed gradually for all other speeds. Thus, adaptation appeared to be more strongly linked to the slow walking speed. This result suggests a separation in the functional networks used for fast and slow walking. We tested this in experiment 2 by adapting walking to split-belts and then determining how much fast regular walking washed out the slow aftereffect, and vice versa. We found that 23-38% of the aftereffect remained regardless of which speed was washed out first. This demonstrates that there is only partial overlap in the functional networks coordinating different walking speeds. Taken together, our results suggest that there are some neural networks for controlling locomotion that are recruited specifically for fast versus slow walking in humans, similar to recent findings in other vertebrates.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.